Manufacturers that rely on photolithography---whether in printed circuit board (PCB) fabrication, flexible electronics, or large‑format graphic printing---need exposure tools that can keep pace with demanding production schedules. Modern Automated Screen Exposure Units (ASEUs) combine precise light delivery, repeatable positioning, and integrated workflow software to eliminate manual errors and boost throughput. Below is a curated look at the top ASEUs on the market today, followed by a practical buying guide for high‑volume environments.
Why Automation Matters in Screen Exposure
| Traditional Manual Exposure | Automated Exposure |
|---|---|
| Operator‑dependent focus and timing | Closed‑loop control of dose and alignment |
| Limited repeatability (±5 % variance) | Sub‑micron positioning repeatability |
| Slow change‑over between screens | Rapid media loading/unloading, barcode‑driven job queue |
| High scrap rate on large runs | Real‑time defect detection and auto‑rejection |
In high‑volume production, even a 1 % improvement in yield translates into thousands of dollars saved per month. Automated units also free skilled technicians to focus on higher‑value tasks such as process optimization and quality analysis.
Top Automated Screen Exposure Units (2025)
1. MikroMaat X‑Pro 6000 -- Industry Leader for PCB & Flex Circuits
- Light Source : 365 nm UV LED array, 1.2 kW, pulse‑width modulation for dose fine‑tuning.
- Resolution : 0.5 µm pixel‑size, 0‑255 gray‑scale levels.
- Throughput : Up to 30 m² /hr (continuous roll‑to‑roll).
- Key Automation :
- Dual‑axis robot arm with 0.01 mm repeatability.
- Integrated barcode scanner reads screen IDs and automatically loads preset exposure parameters.
- Vision system verifies register alignment before each exposure.
- Software : MikroMaat Control Suite (Windows‑based, REST API for MES integration).
- Pros : Exceptional dose accuracy (<±0.5 %), modular LED modules for easy service, proven reliability in >5,000 production lines worldwide.
- Cons : Higher upfront cost; requires proprietary hardware for full integration.
2. GPD E‑Master 450 -- Best Value for Medium‑Scale Production
- Light Source : 405 nm high‑power LEDs, 800 W.
- Resolution : 1 µm pixel, 8‑bit grayscale.
- Throughput : 18 m² /hr (flat‑panel mode) and 22 m² /hr (roll‑to‑roll).
- Key Automation :
- Software : GPD ScreenWorks (Web UI, supports OPC-UA).
- Pros : Lower acquisition cost, intuitive UI, excellent support network in North America and Europe.
- Cons : Slightly lower resolution than premium models; LED lifespan ~ 20 k h before lumen decay exceeds 10 %.
3. AFT Photonics UltraFlash 900 -- High‑Precision Flex & Rigid‑Flex
- Light Source : Pulsed xenon flash lamp with energy recovery optics, 2 kJ per flash.
- Resolution : 0.2 µm pixel, 12‑bit grayscale, true analog exposure capability.
- Throughput : 12 m² /hr (limited by flash cooling cycle).
- Key Automation :
- Software : UltraControl (Python scripting, native integration with common CAD/EDA tools).
- Pros : Unmatched resolution for fine‑line features (<3 µm trace width), flexible exposure curves for specialty resists.
- Cons : Slower overall throughput, requires robust ventilation and cooling infrastructure.
4. Kohler ScreenPro 750 -- Best for Large‑Format Graphic Prints
- Light Source : 450 nm high‑power laser diode array, 1.5 kW.
- Resolution : 0.8 µm pixel, 16‑bit grayscale (smooth tonal gradations).
- Throughput : 35 m² /hr on 2 m × 5 m screens.
- Key Automation :
- Software : Kohler PrintFlow (cloud‑based, AI‑driven defect prediction).
- Pros : Ideal for high‑resolution textile and signage printing; AI reduces scrap by 12 % on average.
- Cons : Laser safety requirements add to installation complexity.
5. Eltek Micro‑Expose 200 -- Compact Unit for High‑Mix, Low‑Volume Runs
- Light Source : UV‑LED (365 nm) 300 W.
- Resolution : 2 µm pixel, 8‑bit grayscale.
- Throughput: 6 m² /hr (batch mode).
- Key Automation :
- Modular cartridge system for quick change of screen frames.
- Integrated PLC with remote monitoring via MQTT.
- Software : Eltek ExposeLite (Android tablet app).
- Pros : Small footprint (<1 m²), low power consumption, excellent for "job‑shop" environments with frequent tool changes.
- Cons : Not suited for continuous roll production; limited to smaller screens (max 600 mm × 800 mm).
Selecting the Right ASEU for Your Facility
| Decision Factor | Recommended Unit(s) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum throughput required | Kohler ScreenPro 750, MikroMaat X‑Pro 6000 | Both exceed 30 m² /hr, handle large‑format media |
| Fine line resolution (<0.5 µm) | AFT Photonics UltraFlash 900 | 0.2 µm pixel, 12‑bit grayscale |
| Budget‑conscious, mid‑range volume | GPD E‑Master 450, Eltek Micro‑Expose 200 | Lower CAPEX, still automated |
| Flex‑circuit specialty | MikroMaat X‑Pro 6000, AFT Photonics UltraFlash 900 | Proven track record in flex & rigid‑flex |
| Integration with existing MES | Units with open APIs (GPD E‑Master, Kohler ScreenPro) | REST/OPC-UA/ MQTT support simplifies connectivity |
| Space constraints | Eltek Micro‑Expose 200 | Compact chassis, minimal floor space |
Additional checklist
- Environmental Controls -- UV sources generate heat; ensure adequate HVAC or localized cooling.
- Safety -- Flash lamps and lasers require interlocks, shielding, and proper PPE protocols.
- Serviceability -- Choose units with modular light sources (LEDs) for quick on‑site swaps.
- Scalability -- Look for expandable exposure heads or the ability to add parallel units in a "cluster" configuration.
- Software Updates -- Vendors that provide regular firmware upgrades protect against obsolescence.
Future Trends Shaping ASEUs
- AI‑Driven Process Optimization -- Real‑time exposure data fed into machine‑learning models to predict optimal dose curves for new photoresists.
- Hybrid Light Sources -- Combining LED and laser diodes to achieve both high power and fine spot control.
- IoT Integration -- Cloud dashboards that monitor lamp life, temperature, and alignment drift across multiple plants.
- Green Manufacturing -- Energy‑efficient LEDs and recyclable screen frames reducing carbon footprint.
Conclusion
Automated screen exposure is no longer a "nice‑to‑have" addition; it's a critical enabler of high‑volume, low‑defect manufacturing. The MikroMaat X‑Pro 6000 remains the benchmark for sheer performance and reliability, while the GPD E‑Master 450 offers a balanced mix of cost and capability for growing operations. For niche applications demanding ultra‑high resolution, the AFT Photonics UltraFlash 900 stands out, whereas the Kohler ScreenPro 750 dominates the graphics sector with its AI‑enhanced workflow.
When selecting an ASEU, align the machine's specifications with your production targets, floor layout, and integration roadmap. By investing in the right automated exposure platform today, you set the foundation for scalable, future‑proof manufacturing that can adapt to evolving substrates, resist chemistries, and market demands.
Happy exposing!